Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

2±Þ ¿Íµ¿ ¼öº¹ ½Ã Çѱ¹ Ä¡°ú Áö»çµéÀÇ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø »ç¿ë ½ÇÅ ¿¬±¸

A SURVEY ON THE USE OF COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS II RESTORATION IN KOREA

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 34±Ç 2È£ p.87 ~ 94
½Åµ¿È£, ¹Ú¼¼Àº, ¾çÀμ®, ÀåÁÖÇý, ÀÌÀκ¹, Á¶º´ÈÆ, ¼ÕÈ£Çö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
½Åµ¿È£ ( Shin Dong-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¹Ú¼¼Àº ( Park Se-Eun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¾çÀμ® ( Yang In-Seok ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀåÁÖÇý ( Chang Ju-Hea ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÀκ¹ ( Lee In-Bog ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
Á¶º´ÈÆ ( Cho Byung-Hoon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¼ÕÈ£Çö ( Son Ho-Hyun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â 2008³â 1¿ù ÇöÀç Çѱ¹ Ä¡°úÀÇ»çµéÀÇ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø »ç¿ë ½ÇÅ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¼³¹® Á¶»ç·Î¼­, 2±Þ ¿Íµ¿À» ¼öº¹ÇÏ´Â Áõ·Ê¿¡¼­ Ä¡°úÀÇ»çÀÇ ¸éÇ㠳⵵, ±³À° ¹è°æ ¹× Áø·áȯ°æ µî¿¡ µû¶ó ¼öº¹Àç·áÀÇ ¼±ÅÃ, º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ »ç¿ë¿©ºÎ ¹× »ç¿ë¹æ¹ý, ¹®Á¦Á¡ µîÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Çѱ¹ Ä¡°úÀÇ»çµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 2±Þ ¿Íµ¿ ¼öº¹¿¡ °üÇÑ 17 ¹®Ç×ÀÇ ¼³¹®Áö¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ ¼³¹®Áö´Â ½Ã¼úÀÚ Á¤º¸, 2±Þ ¿Íµ¿ÀÇ ¼öº¹À¸·Î Å©°Ô 2ºÎºÐÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾îÁø´Ù. ÀÌ ¼³¹®Áö´Â ´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ»çÇùȸ¸¦ ÅëÇØ 12,193¸íÀÇ Ä¡°úÀÇ»çµé¿¡°Ô E-¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¹ß¼ÛµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ Áß 2,612°³ÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ ¼ö½Å È®ÀεǾú°í 840 °³ÀÇ ¼³¹®Áö°¡ ÀÛ¼ºµÇ¾î ȸ½ÅµÇ¾ú´Ù ¼ö½Å È®ÀÎµÈ ¸ÞÀÏ ¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ È¸½ÅµÈ ¸ÞÀÏ ¼öÀÇ ºñÀ² (ȸ½ÅÀ²)Àº 32.2%À̾ú°í, ÀÌ ÀÚ·á´Â SPSS ÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡¼­ Ä«ÀÌÁ¦°ö ºÐ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±³Â÷ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´äº¯ÀÚÀÇ ºñÀ²Àº ¸éÇã³âµµ¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î 1998 ~ 2007³â¿¡ ¸éÇ㸦 ÃëµæÇÑ ±×·ì (Çѱ¹ Àüü Ä¡°úÀÇ»çÀÇ 33.3%, ÃßÁ¤³â·É 26-35¼¼)ÀÌ 60.3%·Î 1997³â ÀÌÀü¿¡ ¸éÇã ÃëµæÇÑ ±×·ì (Çѱ¹ Àüü Ä¡°úÀÇ»çÀÇ 66.7%, ÃßÁ¤ ³â·É 36¼¼ ÀÌ»ó)ÀÇ 39.7%º¸´Ù ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ À̵éÀÌ ±Ù¹«ÇÏ´Â º´¿øÀº °³ÀÎÀÇ¿ø (77%)ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, ³²ÀÚ Ä¡°úÀÇ»ç (79%)°¡ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áö½ÄÀº Çлý ¶§ ¼ö¾÷À̳ª ÇÐȸ ¼¼¹Ì³ª¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© (83.4%) ¾òÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2±Þ ¿Íµ¿ ¼öº¹ ½Ã Àç·á ¼±È£µµ¸¦ »ìÆ캸¸é ±ÝÀη¹ÀÌ°¡ 65.7%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ°í ÀÖ°í º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø Á÷Á¢ ¼öº¹Àº 12.1%·Î ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2±Þ ¿Íµ¿ÀÇ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø Á÷Á¢ ¼öº¹ ½Ã ½Ã¼ú ¹æ¹ý¿¡ À־´Â ·¯¹ö´ïÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Å³ª Àß »ç¿ëÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ±×·ìÀÇ ºñÀ² (74.4%)ÀÌ ´õ ¸¹¾Ò°í, °Ýº®¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â mylar strip (53.4%)À̳ª metal matrix (33.8%), Palodent system (6.5%)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃæÀüÀº ÀûÃþ¹ý (99.6%)À» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ½Ã¼ú ½Ã ÀÎÁ¢¸é Çü¼ºÀ» °¡Àå ¾î·Á¿öÇÏ¿´´Ù(57.2%). 2-step Á¢Âø½Ã½ºÅÛ (76%)ÀÌ 3-step Á¢Âø½Ã½ºÅÛ (16%)º¸´Ù ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ·¹Áø Á¦Ç°À¸·Î´Â Z250 (20%)ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

The purpose of this study was to assess the current materials, methods and difficulties according to the year of licence and educational background of Korean dentists in Class II direct composite resin restorations. Total 17 questions were included in the questionnaire. Questions were broadly divided into two parts: first. operator¡¯s information. and second. the materials and methods used in Class II posterior composite restoration. The questionnaire was sent to dentists enrolled in Korean Dental Association via e-mail. Total 12,193 e-mails were distributed to dentists. 2,612 e-mails were opened, and 840 mails (32.2%) were received from respondents. The data was statically analyzed by chi-square test using SPSS(v. 12.0.1, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Male dentists among respondents was 79%. 60.3% of the respondents acquired their licences recently (1998-2007), and 77% practiced in private offices. 83.4% have acquired their knowledge through school lectures, conferences and seminars. For the Class II restorations, gold inlays were preferred by 65.7% of respondents, while direct composite resin restorations were used by 12.1 % amalgam users were only 4.4% of respondents. For the restorative technique, 74.4% of respondents didn¡¯t use rubber dam as needed. For the matrix. mylar strip (53.4%), metal matrix (33.8%) and Palodent system (6.5%) were used. 99.6% of respondents restored the Class II cavity by incremental layering. Obtaining of the tight interproximal contact was considered as the most difficult procedure (57.2%) followed by field isolation (21 %). Among various bonding systems, 22.6% of respondents preferred SE Bond and 20.2% used Single Bond. Z-250 was used most frequently among a variety of composite resins.

Å°¿öµå

Çѱ¹ Ä¡°úÀÇ»ç;À̸ÞÀÏ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç;º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø;2±Þ ¿Íµ¿ ¼öº¹;Á¢Âø Ä¡ÀÇÇÐ
Korean dentist;E-mail survey;Class II cavity restoration;Composite resin;Adhesive dentistry

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI